Best Linux Distribution For Windows Or Mac Or Amiga Or Dos Or Legacy Software

Jul 29, 2016 - Linux isn't the only alternative PC operating system out there. Outlook add an account. Technically, Steam OS is just a Linux distribution and includes much of the standard Linux software. It's a lightweight operating system “in the tradition of the Amiga and BeOS. An open-source version of DOS — to relive the old DOS years. Mar 25, 2009 - (Don't let the door hit you on the way out, MS-DOS 4.0!). So, what's on the far side of your software shelf? Still drop out to the command line from Windows to flex our old DOS muscles. The Mac and OS/2 fumbled their way around it. The Amiga operating system was so tightly coded that it took the big.

'With a click of a button, you can change the desktop layout to match that of Windows versions and Gnome 3. The Ultimate edition.also features Ubuntu, Gnome 2 and macOS-like layouts.' Shares an article about a Linux-based operating system 'designed for Windows-switchers.'

While the company does charge for an 'Ultimate' version. 'As Zorin OS 12 is based on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, it will be supported with security updates until April 2021. This makes Zorin OS 12 the ideal choice for large deployments in businesses, governments, schools and organisations', says The Zorin OS Team'., such as Google Drive integration with the file browser. Although unlike Windows 10, its default browser is Chromium. No I don't think you will have happy customers. In fact making Linux look exactly like any other operating system like Windows or Mac is a recipe for disaster.

I think of it as the uncanny valley of desktops. At first users may be comforted seeing something familiar. But as they use it, subtle differences will lead to a jarring experience. And sooner or later, as the GP said, users will try to install some cool program they found that won't work when they download it. In my experience moving people from Windows to Linux, having a look and feel that closely resembles Windows is not at all important.

It's not helpful at all. Most Linux desktops function similarly enough to Windows to be nearly immediately usable to most users. Having a look and feel that's different from Windows reinforces the idea that they aren't using Windows anymore, but something different, though it works on the same principles.

I have never changed program icons to 'Excel' or 'Word' as that also would be harmful when they encounter differences (as soon as they open the application. LibreOffice looks and acts very differently from current versions of Office). Instead I make shortcuts entitled 'Word Processor' or 'Spreadsheet.' Often I just leave them as they were.

Really none of this theming nonsense is necessary and it's not helpful to Linux adoption. In fact it may actually be harmful in the long run. Linux desktops have to stand on their own or we're doomed to failure. Linux desktops have to stand on their own or we're doomed to failure. I tend to agree, even though I wouldn't have a few years back. I always thought visual similarity was important for people attempting to transition from Windows -> Linux, but in the end, UI is more than just about the visual, it's also about the interactivity, what people expect to see and whatnot. If you're going to invest time into using Linux, trying to make it look as much like Windows as possible might turn out to be counter-produc.

Google beat them to it on this one. They made web their common platform. Looks pretty much the same on any OS, any browser.

Chrome runs everywhere. Google Docs for office tasks, or even Microsoft Office online or Zoho Office or any number of others.